One of the first things to do while searching at two comparable vehicles is to study the engines, both for energy and gasoline financial system. The preceding CR-V’s 2.4-liter 4-cylinder with 185 horsepower and a torque of 181 pound-feet is now observed best inside the base LX trim level even as all other trims get the new 1.Five-liter turbocharged 4-cylinder with 190 horsepower and 179 pound-toes. The Toyota RAV4 usually offers a single-engine, a 2.Five-liter four-cylinder with 176 horsepower and 172 pound-ft. There is, but, a RAV4 Hybrid that pairs a 2.5-liter Atkinson-cycle four-cylinder with a high-torque electric motor and receives 194 horsepower.
Looking at the figures, until you opt for the RAV4 Hybrid, the 2017 CR-V takes the lead in engine output. For the quality feasible electricity, however, the RAV4 Hybrid is the way to move, despite the fact that you do pay greater for the hybrid. Keep in mind that although the CR-V has barely greater strength, both SUVs can tow up to 1,500 kilos. While neither alternative is going to win any races or haul a horse trailer, they offer greater than sufficient for regular drivers seeking out a green and dependable trip.
Based on the descriptions in their powertrains, it needs to come as no surprise that the 2017 CR-V with the turbocharged engine and the 2017 RAV4 Hybrid are the greenest configurations. For individuals who don’t need a hybrid, the 2017 CR-V ought to be your preference to maximize gasoline economy, as the brand new rapid gets up to twenty-eight city/34 highway mpg (or the bottom engine receives 26/32 mpg). By evaluation, the bottom 2017 RAV4 receives as much as 23/30 mpg, which means that it’s clearly less efficient than the CR-V. That being stated, if you can find the money for a hybrid, the Toyota RAV4 Hybrid is the most efficient of the bunch—and the elegance—with 34 mpg in the town and 30 at the dual carriageway.
For folks who make protection a concern, particularly if you’re seeking out a new circle of relatives car, each the 2017 Toyota RAV4 and the 2017 Honda CR-V deliver. While most models within the class require luxurious enhancements to get superior capabilities, both of these SUVs give you an impressive list of well-known features, with the advantage going to the RAV4. For the 2017 version year, the RAV4 capabilities Toyota Safety Sense as trendy, that means every unmarried model has Forward Collision Warning featuring Automatic Braking, Adaptive Cruise Control, and Lane Keeping Assist. While those features aren’t preferred on the bottom CR-V, they do come at the EX and higher trims. Both SUVs additionally provide rear pass-site visitors alert and blind-spot tracking for better trim ranges.
Interior Space, Versatility, and Comfort
With its latest redesign, the 2017 Honda CR-V has a bonus in the cabin, despite the fact that a few drivers will decide on the RAV4’s utilitarian styling. The RAV4, in reality, feels more commercial and features more tough plastic with SofTex artificial upholstery provided on better trims rather than true leather. The CR-V has a visual appeal with richer capabilities and to be had actual leather. The middle console on the CR-V is likewise a winner, without difficulty becoming various items.
While the CR-V’s interior lead maintains in cargo capability, the Toyota RAV4 isn’t always a way behind. These SUVs sincerely come first and 2nd inside the class in storage area with even the RAV4’s 73.Four cubic ft beating competitors through among 5 and 20 cubic ft. The CR-V’s more 2.4 cubic ft compared to the RAV4 offers it a slight advantage, but most drivers, even busy families, gained’t need the extra space in an actual-international putting. Either SUV also provides a low load floor that allows you to get heavy objects interior.
Keep in mind, however, that the CR-V also has slightly greater rear legroom. Parents will respect that this latest CR-V also has 3 complete units for LATCH connections in its 2nd row, while the RAV4 has full connections (for the outboard seats) and a tether within the middle seat. While this means the CR-V is extra flexible for car seats, the RAV4 has to have sufficient connections for the average own family.
When it involves the generation, the contrast between the RAV4 and CR-V isn’t as trustworthy. The CR-V has extra available functions on its infotainment machine, however, maximum people have a tendency to agree that the RAV4’s device is simpler to apply.
On the bottom fashions, the RAV4 has the bigger touchscreen display: 6.1 inches as compared to the CR-V’s five-inch show. One step up to the CR-V EX trim, but, brings you a 7-inch touchscreen, even as the RAV4 requires you to step as much as the Limited trim (skipping the two lower trims), meaning the Honda provides the larger touchscreen at a decrease rate factor. Generally speaking, both touchscreen systems are easy to use. Even so, the RAV4’s is simpler right from the beginning, although you may probably get used to the CR-V’s speedy.
If infotainment capabilities are your important problem and you are willing to pay for them, the Honda CR-V has a bonus. It gives satellite tv for pc radio, Android Audio, Apple CarPlay, and an excellent 4 USB ports. You can most effectively get a single USB port on the RAV4 and satellite tv for pc radio, now not the opposite features. For folks that aren’t making plans to upgrade from the base version, the RAV4 is a clear winner with its superior voice popularity, Bluetooth, USB port, and six speakers similar to the bigger touchscreen. The CR-V doesn’t have the superior voice recognition inside the base version and only functions four speakers on that entry-stage configuration.
The final location for an assessment between the 2017 Toyota RAV4 and 2017 Honda CR-V is pricing, in which the CR-V does slightly better, however, best in case you just examine the charge itself instead of what is included. The CR-V starts at $24,1/2 whilst the RAV4 starts offevolved at $24,910. That slightly better rate tag for the RAV4, but, comes with the entire Toyota Safety Sense P suite and the higher infotainment machine. You could need to improve to the CR-V EX (at $26,695) for Honda’s version of those functions.
Ultimately, it’s a tough battle among these two own family-friendly crossovers. Bargain consumers seeking out the exceptional base version will need to study the Toyota RAV4. For all and sundry else, the refreshed Honda CR-V is the first-rate desire in maximum configurations with increased fuel economic system, extra legroom and load space, and an up to date indoors. We’ll revisit those pinnacle selling SUVs when Toyota delivers a refreshed model of their own.
2017 Toyota Rav4 vs. 2017 Honda CR-V | Daily News Autos Review